Impacto de los algoritmos de sobremuestreo en la clasificación de subtipos principales del síndrome de Guillain-Barré

Contenido principal del artículo

Oscar Chávez-Bosquez
Manuel Torres-Vásquez
José Hernández-Torruco
Betania Hernández-Ocaña


El Síndrome de Guillain-Barré es un trastorno neu-rológico donde el sistema inmune del cuerpo ataca al sistema nervioso periférico. Esta enfermedad es de rápida evolución y es la causa más frecuente de parálisis del cuerpo. Existen cuatro variantes de SGB: Polineuropatía Desmielinizante Inflamatoria Aguda, Neuropatía Axonal Motora Aguda, Neuropatía Axonal Sensorial Aguda y Síndrome de Miller-Fisher. Identificar el subtipo de SGB que el paciente contrajo es determinante debido a que el tratamiento es diferente para cada subtipo. El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar cuál algoritmo de sobremuestreo mejora el rendimiento de los clasificadores. Además, determinar si balancear los datos mejoran el rendimiento de los modelos predictivos. Aplicamos tres métodos de sobremuestro (ROS, SMOTE y ADASYN) a la clase minoritaria, utilizamos tres clasificadores (C4.5,SVM y JRip). El rendimiento de los modelos se obtuvo mediante la curva ROC. Los resultados muestran que balancear el dataset mejora el rendimiento de los modelos predictivos. El algoritmo SMOTE fue el mejor método de balanceo en combinación con el clasificador JRip para OVO y el clasificador C4.5para OVA.
Abstract 51 | PDF Downloads 15 PDF (English) Downloads 2


[1] P. A. van Doorn, “Guillain-Barré syndrome,” in Dysimmune Neuropathies. Elsevier, 2020, pp. 5–29. [Online]. Available:
[2] A. Tellería-Díaz and D. Calzada-Sierra, “Síndrome de Guillain-Barré,” Revista de Neurología, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 966–976, 2002. [Online]. Available:
[3] E. Alpaydin, Introduction to Machine Learning. MIT press, 2020. [Online]. Available:
[4] J. A. Cruz and D. S. Wishart, “Applications of Machine Learning in cancer prediction and prognosis,” Cancer Informatics, vol. 2, p. 117693510600200, jan 2006. [Online]. Available:
[5] A. R. Vaka, B. Soni, and S. R. K., “Breast cancer detection by leveraging Machine Learning,” ICT Express, may 2020. [Online]. Available:
[6] H. Kaur and V. Kumari, “Predictive modelling and analytics for diabetes using a machine learning approach,” Applied Computing and Informatics, dec 2018. [Online]. Available:
[7] N. P. Tigga and S. Garg, “Prediction of Type 2 Diabetes using Machine Learning classification methods,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 167, pp. 706–716, 2020. [Online]. Available:
[8] Z. K. Senturk, “Early diagnosis of parkinson’s disease using machine learning algorithms,” Medical Hypotheses, vol. 138, p. 109603, may 2020. [Online]. Available:
[9] A. Khan and S. Zubair, “An improved multimodal based Machine Learning approach for the prognosis of Alzheimer’s disease,” Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, apr 2020. [Online]. Available:
[10] A. Fernández, S. García, M. Galar, R. C. Prati, B. Krawczyk, and F. Herrera, Learning from Imbalanced Data Sets. Springer International Publishing, 2018. [Online]. Available:
[11] G. Haixiang, L. Yijing, J. Shang, G. Mingyun, H. Yuanyue, and G. Bing, “Learning from class-imbalanced data: Review of methods and applications,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 73, pp. 220–239, may 2017. [Online]. Available:
[12] A. Fernández, S. García, F. Herrera, and N. V. Chawla, “SMOTE for learning from imbalanced data: Progress and challenges, marking the 15-year anniversary,” Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, vol. 61, pp. 863–905, apr 2018. [Online]. Available:
[13] K. Napierala and J. Stefanowski, “Types of minority class examples and their influence on learning classifiers from imbalanced data,” Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 563–597, jul 2015. [Online]. Available:
[14] J. Canul-Reich, J. Frausto-Solís, and J. Hernández-Torruco, “A predictive model for Guillain-Barré syndrome based on single learning algorithms,” Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, vol. 2017, pp. 1–9, 2017. [Online]. Available:
[15] J. Canul-Reich, J. Hernández-Torruco, O. Chávez-Bosquez, and B. Hernández-Ocaña, “A predictive model for Guillain-Barré syndrome based on ensemble methods,” Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, vol. 2018, pp. 1–10, 2018. [Online]. Available:
[16] J. Hernández-Torruco, J. Canul-Reich, J. Frausto-Solís, and J. J. Méndez-Castillo, “Feature selection for better identification of subtypes of Guillain-Barré syndrome,” Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, vol. 2014, pp. 1–9, 2014. [Online]. Available:
[17] A. Fernández, S. del Río, N. V. Chawla, and F. Herrera, “An insight into imbalanced big data classification: Outcomes and challenges,” Complex & Intelligent Systems, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 105–120, 2017. [Online]. Available:
[18] N. V. Chawla, K. W. Bowyer, L. O. Hall, and W. P. Kegelmeyer, “SMOTE: Synthetic minority over-sampling technique,” Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, vol. 16, pp. 321–357, jun 2002. [Online]. Available:
[19] H. He, Y. Bai, E. A. García, and S. Li, “ADASYN: Adaptive synthetic sampling approach for imbalanced learning,” in 2008 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence). IEEE, jun 2008. [Online]. Available:
[20] S. Ruggieri, “Efficient C4.5 [classification algorithm],” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 438–444, 2002. [Online]. Available:
[21] T. S. Furey, N. Cristianini, N. Duffy, D. W. Bednarski, M. Schummer, and D. Haussler, “Support Vector Machine classification and validation of cancer tissue samples using microarray expression data,” Bioinformatics, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 906–914, 2000. [Online]. Available:
[22] A. Rajput, R. P. Aharwal, M. Dubey, S. Saxena, and M. Raghuvanshi, “J48 and JRip rules for e-governance data,” International Journal of Computer Science and Security (IJCSS), vol. 5, no. 2, p. 201, 2011. [Online]. Available:
[23] R. Kannan and V. Vasanthi, “Machine learning algorithms with ROC curve for predicting and diagnosing the heart disease,” in Soft Computing and Medical Bioinformatics. Springer Singapore, jun 2018, pp. 63–72. [Online]. Available:
[24] A. Fernández, V. López, M. Galar, M. J. del Jesús, and F. Herrera, “Analysing the classification of imbalanced data-sets with multiple classes: Binarization techniques and ad-hoc approaches,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 42, pp. 97–110, apr 2013. [Online]. Available:
[25] A. D. Pozzolo, O. Caelen, and G. Bontempi, unbalanced: Racing for Unbalanced Methods Selection, 2015, R package version 2.0. [Online]. Available:
[26] L. Torgo, Data Mining with R, learning with case studies. Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2010. [Online]. Available:
[27] P. Branco, R. P. Ribeiro, and L. Torgo, “UBL: an R package for utility-based learning,” CoRR, vol. abs/1604.08079, 2016. [Online]. Available:
[28] I. H. Witten, E. Frank, M. A. Hall, and C. Pañ, Data Mining, Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, Elsevier, Ed. Morgan Kaufmann, 2017. [Online]. Available:
[29] D. Meyer, E. Dimitriadou, K. Hornik, A. Weingessel, and F. Leisch, e1071: Misc Functions of the Department of Statistics, Probability Theory Group (Formerly: E1071), TU Wien, 2018, R package version 1.7-0. [Online]. Available:
[30] A. S. Hussein, T. Li, W. Y. Chubato, and K. Bashir, “A-SMOTE: A new preprocessing approach for highly imbalanced datasets by improving SMOTE,” International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 2019. [Online]. Available: