Watch and surveillance: A content analysis of the National Registry of Internet Access in Brazil
Main Article Content
Abstract
of children and adolescents. The present article establishes a theoretical dialogue with the postulates of Manuel Castells in an attempt to demystify the arguments in favor of the control and uses a qualitative investigation by means of a survey and analysis of content of the bills of laws that still are processed in
the National Brazilian Congress. It is evident that the current draft legislation establishes fruitful threats to the guiding principles, guarantees, rights and duties for the use of the Internet in Brazil, camouflaged in moralistic narratives and dissonant and interested arguments of Law No. 12,965, leading to the understanding that there are eminent possibilities of expanding the control and monitoring of the information consumed and produced by Brazilian Internet users.
Article Details
Authorship: The list of authors signing must include only those people who have contributed intellectually to the development of the work. Collaboration in the collection of data is not, by itself, a sufficient criterion of authorship. "Retos" declines any responsibility for possible conflicts arising from the authorship of the works that are published.
Copyright: The Salesian Polytechnic University preserves the copyrights of the published articles, and favors and allows their reuse under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Ecuador license. They may be copied, used, disseminated, transmitted and publicly displayed, provided that: i) the authorship and the original source of their publication (journal, editorial and work URL) are cited; (Ii) are not used for commercial purposes; Iii) mention the existence and specifications of this license.
References
Castells, M. (2005). A Sociedade em Rede (8ª ed). São Bernardo do Campo: Paz e Terra.
_____ (2008). O Poder da identidade (6ª ed). São Paulo: Paz e Terra.
Cleland, S. & Brodsky, I. (2012). Busque e destrua: por que você não pode confiar no Google Inc. São Paulo: Matrix.
Dovring, K. (2009). Quantitative Semantics in 18th Century Sweden. En K. Krippendorff & M.A. Bock (Eds.), The Content Analysis Reader. London: Sage.
Gorz, A. (2005). O imaterial: conhecimento, valor e capital. São Paulo: Annablume.
Kerr, O. S. (2014). The Fourth Amendment and the Global Internet. GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 2014-30; GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2014-30. Disponible en SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2428042
Marco Civil da Internet (2014). Câmara dos Deputados, Brasil. Brasilia: Edições Câmara.
McMillan, S.J. (2009). The Challegen of applying Content Analysis to the WorldWide Web. En K. Krippendorff & M.A. Bock (Eds.), The Content Analysis Reader. London: Sage.
Murdoch, S. J. & Roberts, H. (2013). Internet Censorship and Control. IEEE Internet Computing, 17(3), 6-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/mic.2013.51
O’Connell, M. (1999). Is Irish public opinion towards crime distorted by media bias? European Journal of Communication, 14(2), 191-212.
Pierucci, A. (2003). O desencantamento do mundo: todos os passos do conceito em Max Weber. São Paulo: Editora 34.
Puyosa, I. (2015). Control politico de internet en el contexto de un régimen híbrido. Venezuela 2007-2015. Teknokultura, 12(3), 501-526. http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/rev_tk.2015.v12.n3.50392.
Schreier, M. (2014). Qualitative Content Analysis? En U. Flick (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis. London: Sage.
Silverstone, R. (2005). Por que estudar a mídia? (2ª ed). São Paulo: Edições Loyola.