Watch and surveillance: A content analysis of the National Registry of Internet Access in Brazil

Main Article Content

Fernando Nobre Cavalcante

Abstract

The legalization and institutionalization of the surveillance of the digital information of the Brazilian citizens has been promoted by interests of Protestant political groups that argue ideas of faith and morality in draft laws that promote new forms of Internet control. Since 2015, different bills have threatened the right to privacy and freedom of expression in digital communications, guaranteed by Act No. 12.965, of April 23, 2014 (Civil Internet Framework). The present research analyzes the critical points of the projects of law of control of Internet promoted by evangelical politicians and justified in moral arguments of protection
of children and adolescents. The present article establishes a theoretical dialogue with the postulates of Manuel Castells in an attempt to demystify the arguments in favor of the control and uses a qualitative investigation by means of a survey and analysis of content of the bills of laws that still are processed in
the National Brazilian Congress. It is evident that the current draft legislation establishes fruitful threats to the guiding principles, guarantees, rights and duties for the use of the Internet in Brazil, camouflaged in moralistic narratives and dissonant and interested arguments of Law No. 12,965, leading to the understanding that there are eminent possibilities of expanding the control and monitoring of the information consumed and produced by Brazilian Internet users.

Article Details

Section
Monographic section
Author Biography

Fernando Nobre Cavalcante

Doctorando en Estudios de los Medios en la Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte y docente de la UNI7

References

Boréus, K. & Bergström, G. (2017). Content Analysis. En Bergström, Göran & Boréus, Kristina (Eds.), Analyzing text and discourse: Eight approaches for the Social Sciences. London: Sage Publications.
Castells, M. (2005). A Sociedade em Rede (8ª ed). São Bernardo do Campo: Paz e Terra.
_____ (2008). O Poder da identidade (6ª ed). São Paulo: Paz e Terra.
Cleland, S. & Brodsky, I. (2012). Busque e destrua: por que você não pode confiar no Google Inc. São Paulo: Matrix.
Dovring, K. (2009). Quantitative Semantics in 18th Century Sweden. En K. Krippendorff & M.A. Bock (Eds.), The Content Analysis Reader. London: Sage.
Gorz, A. (2005). O imaterial: conhecimento, valor e capital. São Paulo: Annablume.
Kerr, O. S. (2014). The Fourth Amendment and the Global Internet. GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 2014-30; GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2014-30. Disponible en SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2428042
Marco Civil da Internet (2014). Câmara dos Deputados, Brasil. Brasilia: Edições Câmara.
McMillan, S.J. (2009). The Challegen of applying Content Analysis to the WorldWide Web. En K. Krippendorff & M.A. Bock (Eds.), The Content Analysis Reader. London: Sage.
Murdoch, S. J. & Roberts, H. (2013). Internet Censorship and Control. IEEE Internet Computing, 17(3), 6-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/mic.2013.51
O’Connell, M. (1999). Is Irish public opinion towards crime distorted by media bias? European Journal of Communication, 14(2), 191-212.
Pierucci, A. (2003). O desencantamento do mundo: todos os passos do conceito em Max Weber. São Paulo: Editora 34.
Puyosa, I. (2015). Control politico de internet en el contexto de un régimen híbrido. Venezuela 2007-2015. Teknokultura, 12(3), 501-526. http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/rev_tk.2015.v12.n3.50392.
Schreier, M. (2014). Qualitative Content Analysis? En U. Flick (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis. London: Sage.
Silverstone, R. (2005). Por que estudar a mídia? (2ª ed). São Paulo: Edições Loyola.