Critical Phenomenology of Prompting in Artificial Intelligence
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper analyzes the philosophy of prompting as a tool within the context of the rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly in large language models (LLMs). The topic is justified by
the need to understand the prompt as a mediating space between human intentionality, language, and the sociopolitical structures that shape interactions with these technologies. The central
objective is to examine how prompting reflects ethical, ontological, and epistemological tensions
that arise in the construction of meaning within AI systems. Methodologically, the study adopts a critical-phenomenological approach, combining first-person experiences (user) with practical experimentation of prompts in different scenarios. The results demonstrate that the prompt is not merely a technical instruction but a discursive practice, where human decisions, such as
the configuration of “parameters” (e. g., temperature and Top P), directly influence the outputs
generated by AI systems. While these decisions appear technical, they carry significant ethical and epistemological implications that demand critical examination. The study concludes that it is essential to adopt an interdisciplinary approach that integrates technical development with
philosophical reflection. This approach would foster an ethical, conscious, and responsible use of
AI while recognizing the central role of humans in interactions with these emerging technologies.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authorship: The list of authors signing must include only those people who have contributed intellectually to the development of the work. Collaboration in the collection of data is not, by itself, a sufficient criterion of authorship. "Sophia" declines any responsibility for possible conflicts arising from the authorship of the works that are published.
Copyright: The Salesian Polytechnic University preserves the copyrights of the published articles, and favors and allows their reuse under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Ecuador license. They may be copied, used, disseminated, transmitted and publicly displayed, provided that: i) the authorship and the original source of their publication (journal, editorial and work URL) are cited; (Ii) are not used for commercial purposes; Iii) mention the existence and specifications of this license.
References
, P. (2001). Ethics, Regulation and the New Artificial Intelligence, Part I: Accountability and Power. Information, Communication & Society, 4(2), 199-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/713768525
Bory, P., Natale, S., & Katzenbach, C. (2024). Strong and weak AI narratives: An analytical framework. AI & SOCIETY. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-02087-8
Bringsjord, S., & Govindarajulu, N. S. (2024). Artificial Intelligence. En E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2024). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2024/entries/artificial-intelligence/
Bucknall, B. S., & Dori-Hacohen, S. (2022). Current and Near-Term AI as a Potential Existential Risk Factor. Proceedings of the 2022 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 119-129. https://doi.org/10.1145/3514094.3534146
Chen, B., Wu, Z., & Zhao, R. (2023). From fiction to fact: The growing role of generative AI in business and finance. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 21(4), 471-496. https://doi.org/10.1080/14765284.2023.2245279
Chiarella, S. G., Torromino, G., Gagliardi, D. M., Rossi, D., Babiloni, F., & Cartocci, G. (2022). Investigating the negative bias towards artificial intelligence: Effects of prior assignment of AI-authorship on the aesthetic appreciation of abstract paintings. Computers in Human Behavior, 137, 107406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107406
Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition. Columbia University Press.
Deshpande, A., Rajpurohit, T., Narasimhan, K., & Kalyan, A. (2023). Anthropomorphization of AI: Opportunities and Risks. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2305.14784
Döderlein, J.-B., Acher, M., Khelladi, D. E., & Combemale, B. (2023). Piloting Copilot and Codex: Hot Temperature, Cold Prompts, or Black Magic? (No. arXiv:2210.14699). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2210.14699
Floridi, L. (2023). The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Oxford University Press (OUP). https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198883098.001.0001
Foucault, M. (1994a). Dits et Écrits 1970-1975 (Vol. 2). Gallimard.
Foucault, M. (1994b). Dits et Écrits 1976-1979 (Vol. 3). Gallimard.
Goertzel, B. (2015). Superintelligence: Fears, Promises and Potentials: Reflections on Bostrom’s Superintelligence, Yudkowsky’s From AI to Zombies, and Weaver and Veitas’s «Open-Ended Intelligence.» Journal of Ethics and Emerging Technologies, 25(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.55613/jeet.v25i2.48
Gonzalez, Jorge. (2024). Artificial Intelligence and the New Dynamics of Social Death: A Critical Phenomenological Inquiry (September 01, 2024). Available at SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4955995
Gu, J., Han, Z., Chen, S., Beirami, A., He, B., Zhang, G., Liao, R., Qin, Y., Tresp, V., & Torr, P. (2023). A Systematic Survey of Prompt Engineering on Vision-Language Foundation Models (No. arXiv:2307.12980). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.12980
Hartmann, J., Schwenzow, J., & Witte, M. (2023). The political ideology of conversational AI: Converging evidence on ChatGPT’s pro-environmental, left-libertarian orientation (No. arXiv:2301.01768). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.01768
Heidegger, M., Stambaugh, J., & Heidegger, M. (1996). Being and time. State Univ. of New York Press.
Homolak, J. (2023). Opportunities and risks of ChatGPT in medicine, science, and academic publishing: A modern Promethean dilemma. Croatian Medical Journal, 64(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2023.64.1
Kumar, S., & Choudhury, S. (2023). Humans, super humans, and super humanoids: Debating Stephen Hawking’s doomsday AI forecast. AI and Ethics, 3(3), 975-984. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00213-0
Lee, J. H., Shin, J., & Realff, M. J. (2018). Machine learning: Overview of the recent progresses and implications for the process systems engineering field. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 114, 111-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2017.10.008
Liu, H. (2014). Philosophical Reflections on Data. Procedia Computer Science, 30, 60-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.05.381
Merleau-ponty, M. (1993). Fenomenología dela percepción. Editorial Planeta Argentina.
Meskó, B. (2023). Prompt Engineering as an Important Emerging Skill for Medical Professionals: Tutorial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25, e50638. https://doi.org/10.2196/50638
Morreale, F., Bahmanteymouri, E., Burmester, B., Chen, A., & Thorp, M. (2024). The unwitting labourer: Extracting humanness in AI training. AI & SOCIETY, 39(5), 2389-2399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01692-3
Noah Harari, Y. (2023). Yuval Noah Harari argues that AI has hacked the operating system of human civilisation. The Economist. https://bit.ly/3DippkO
Peeperkorn, M., Kouwenhoven, T., Brown, D., & Jordanous, A. (2024). Is Temperature the Creativity Parameter of Large Language Models? (No. arXiv:2405.00492). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.00492
Placani, A. (2024). Anthropomorphism in AI: Hype and fallacy. AI and Ethics, 4(3), 691-698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00419-4
Prompting Techniques – Nextra. (2024, septiembre 9). https://bit.ly/4gfQaFc
Ricœur, P. (2010). Memory, history, forgetting (K. Blamey & D. Pellauer, Trads.). University of Chicago Press.
Roser, M. (2024). The brief history of artificial intelligence: The world has changed fast — what might be next? Our World in Data. https://bit.ly/4iE1sVq
Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2020). Artificial intelligence—A modern approach by Stuart Russell and Peter Norvig, Prentice Hall. Series in Artificial Intelligence, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Pearson.
Sartre, J.-P. (1984). Being and Nothingness. Washington Square Press.
Searle, J. R. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 417-457.
Silva, A. de O., & Janes, D. dos S. (2022). The emergence of ChatGPT and its implications for education and academic research in the 21st century. Review of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 3, e6-e6. https://doi.org/10.37497/rev.artif.intell.educ.v3i00.6
Vallor, S. (2024). The AI Mirror: How to Reclaim Our Humanity in an Age of Machine Thinking (1.a ed.). Oxford University PressNew York. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197759066.001.0001
Wang, S., Cooper, N., & Eby, M. (2024). From human-centered to social-centered artificial intelligence: Assessing ChatGPT’s impact through disruptive events. Big Data & Society, 11(4), 20539517241290220. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517241290220
Weiss, G., Murphy, A. V., & Salamon, G. (Eds.). (2019). 50 Concepts for a Critical Phenomenology. Northwestern University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvmx3j22
Zarifhonarvar, A. (2023). Economics of ChatGPT: A Labor Market View on the Occupational Impact of Artificial Intelligence [Working Paper]. Kiel, Hamburg: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics. https://bit.ly/4gBn4Qa