Logical reasoning; logical argument; propositional structure; scientific and philosophical text; textual logical sense.
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article presents an epistemological analysis of the contributions of argumentative logic and propositional logic, based on propositional structures that make up the logical arguments, as models for the construction of arguments in scientific and philosophical texts. The aim of the research was to identify the common theoretical perspectives of argumentative logic and propositional logic, which contribute to the cognitive process of logical reasoning and its transposition into logical language, which demonstrate how to use the propositional and
argumentative structure in the construction of scientific and philosophical texts, to communicate their ideas with consistency, clarity, objectivity and cohesion. The reasons for the study was derived from the practice of orientation completion works of the undergraduate courses, where it was
possible to perceive the difficulties of higher education students to build texts with necessary and sufficient logical consistency to the reader’s understanding. The theoretical basis of the research was based on concepts, ideas and theories of philosophers, mathematicians and researchers dedicated to the study of logic, especially Aristotle (2010), Kant (1992), Frege (2009), Copi (1981) and Weston (1996). The methodological approach was ushered by the proceedings of qualitative
research, enabling the interpretation of the logical processes that can contribute to the construction of arguments in text scientific-philosophical approach the research was based on the deductive method, with the composition of logical reports arguments and the use of the procedures of observation and literature. The results indicated that the propositional structure of deductive arguments can be used to build logical arguments reports, and useful to synthesize information and communicate ideas and theories, scientific and philosophical texts with levels of greater comprehensibility for the reader.
Article Details
Authorship: The list of authors signing must include only those people who have contributed intellectually to the development of the work. Collaboration in the collection of data is not, by itself, a sufficient criterion of authorship. "Sophia" declines any responsibility for possible conflicts arising from the authorship of the works that are published.
Copyright: The Salesian Polytechnic University preserves the copyrights of the published articles, and favors and allows their reuse under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Ecuador license. They may be copied, used, disseminated, transmitted and publicly displayed, provided that: i) the authorship and the original source of their publication (journal, editorial and work URL) are cited; (Ii) are not used for commercial purposes; Iii) mention the existence and specifications of this license.
References
2010 Órganon: Categorias, Da Interpretação, Analíticos Anteriores, Analíticos posteriores,Tópicos e Refutações Sofísticas. Trad. Bini e Edson. São Paulo: Edipro.
BRANQUINHO, João, MURCHO, Desidério, & GOMES, Nelson Gonçalves.
2006 Enciclopédia de termos lógico-filosóficos. São Paulo: Martins Fontes.
BUCHHOLZ, Kai
2009 Compreender Wittgenstein. Trad. Vilmar Schneider. 2.ed. Petropolis-RJ: Vozes.
CHRYSIKOU, Evangelia G.
2013 Mente criativa em ação. In: Glaucia Leal (Org.), A descoberta da criatividade. Revista Mente Cérebro, 1. São Paulo: Duetto.
COPI, Irving M.
1981 Introdução à Lógica. Trad. Alvaro Cabral. 2ª edição. São Paulo: Mestre Jou.
DURVAL, Raymond
2003 Registros de representação semiótica e funcionamento cognitivo da compreensão em matemática. In: Silvia D. A. Machado (Org.), Aprendizagem em Matemática: registros de representação semiótica. São Paulo: Papirus.
FREGE, Gottlob
2009 Lógica e filosofia da linguagem. São Paulo: EDUSP.
GADAMER, Hans-Georg
2012 A Hermenêutica. In: Jean Grondin (Org.), O Pensamento de Gadamer. São Paulo: Paulus.
KAMII, Constance
1999 A criança e o número. 20. Ed. São Paulo: Papirus.
KANT, Immanuel
1992 Lógica. Trad. Gottlob Benjamim J. G. Almeida. Rio de Janeiro: Tempo Brasileiro.
MARITAIN, Jacques
2001 Elementos de Filosofia II: A Ordem dos Conceitos, Lógica Menor (Lógica Formal). Rio de Janeiro: Agir.
MATURANA, R. Humberto.
2001 Cognição, ciência e vida cotidiana. Organização e tradução Cristina Magro, e Victor Paredes. Belo Horizonte-MG: UFMG.
MURCHO, Desidério
2003 O lugar da lógica na filosofia. Lisboa-Portugal: Plátano.
SEVERINO, Antonio Joaquim
2007 Metodologia do Trabalho Científico. 23.ed. São Paulo: Cortez.
SILVEIRA, Marisa R. Abreu
2012 Matemática é pra poucos – um sentido marcado na historia. In: Ocsana Sonia Danyluk (Org.), Historia da Educação Matemática: escrita e
reescrita de historias. Porto Alegre-RS: Sulina.
WESTON, Anthony
1996 A arte de argumentar. Trad. Desidério Murcho. 2. Ed. Lisboa-Portugal: Gradiva.
WHITEHEAD, Alfred North
2006 A ciência e o mundo moderno. Trad. Hermann Herbert. São Paulo: Paulus.
WILLINGHAM, Daniel T
2011 Por que os alunos não gostam da escola? Respostas da ciência cognitiva para tornar a sala de aula atrativa e efetiva. Trad. Marcos Vinícius. Porto Alegre-RS: Artmed.
WITTGENSTEIN, Ludwig
1995 Tratados Lógicos-Filosoficos. Tradução e Prefácio M. S. Lourenço. Lisboa-
Portugal: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.