Logical proposition as a tool for reality understanding and transformation
Main Article Content
Abstract
A reflection on the importance of formal logic, and logic proposition in the understanding of reality is performed. It is supported the idea that the proposition is a fundamental element in logic figuration, in understanding process and reality transformation; in order to that proposal a distinction of terms used in the field of formal logic is realized, an explanation of relationship between logical thought and language is made, brief features about structure of propositions and relationship between names, sense and meaning are explained, importance of the proposition in reality understanding is argued and if there are limits for what can be though or represented in logical propositions. This work´s guidelines are mainly based on the principles arising from the line of thought known as logical empiricism. It is sought to give a response to the questions: Is it necessary for logic to focus its attention on language in order to understand reality? Which roll does proposition have on reality abstraction process? Has proposition, besides allowing understanding of reality, a fundamental roll on reality’s transformation? For that purpose an analytic methodology is used. There are obtained elements which help to understand proposition’s value in the human reality understanding form –mental reality construction or figuration–, communicates what is understood –through language– and builds new realities – environmental
creation and modification.
Article Details
Authorship: The list of authors signing must include only those people who have contributed intellectually to the development of the work. Collaboration in the collection of data is not, by itself, a sufficient criterion of authorship. "Sophia" declines any responsibility for possible conflicts arising from the authorship of the works that are published.
Copyright: The Salesian Polytechnic University preserves the copyrights of the published articles, and favors and allows their reuse under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Ecuador license. They may be copied, used, disseminated, transmitted and publicly displayed, provided that: i) the authorship and the original source of their publication (journal, editorial and work URL) are cited; (Ii) are not used for commercial purposes; Iii) mention the existence and specifications of this license.
References
1963 [1959] An introduction to Wittgenstein´s tractatus. New York: Harper Torchbooks.
CÁRDENAS-MARÍN, William
2011 Contribuciones de la lógica formal para el desarrollo del pensamiento en los niños de 12 años de edad de la Unidad Educativa San Patricio (Tesis de grado). Quito: Universidad Politécnica Salesiana. 2016 Reflexiones sobre el nombrar a partir de la comprensión del lenguaje de Saul Kripke/Reflections on naming from Saul Kripke´s language comprehension.
Sophia, 20(1), 103-116.
CARNAP, Rudolf
1981 [1959] La superación de la metafísica mediante el análisis lógico del lenguaje. In A. Ayer, El positivismo lógico (pp. 66-87). México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
COPI, Irving
1999 Introducción a la Lógica. Buenos Aires: Eudeba.
KENNY, Anthony
2006 [1973] Wittgenstein. USA: Blackwell Publishing.
KRIPKE, Saul
1972 Naming and Necessity. En: D. Davidson, & G. Harman, Semantics of Natural Language (pp. 253-355). Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
MACIÀ, Josep
2004 Proper Names: Ideas and Chains. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 30, 129-155.
MOUNCE, Howard
1983 Introducción al “Tractatus” de Wittgenstein. Madrid: Tecnos.
RUSSELL, Bertrand
1967 El atomismo lógico. En: A. Ayer, El positivismo lógico (pp. 30-100). México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
1997 The problems of Philosophy. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
2009 [1903-1959] The Basic Writings of Bertrand Russell. (R. Egner, & L. Denonn, Eds.)
New York: Routledge.
RYLE, Gilbert
1981 [1959] Argumentos filosóficos. En: A. Ayer, El positivismo lógico (pp. 331-348). México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
SANTAMARÍA, Freddy
2011 El nombrar, la necesidad y la identidad. Kripke y la teoría de la referencia. Escritos, 19(43), 401-419.
SCHLICK, Moritz
1981 [1959] Positivismo y realismo. En: A. Ayer, El positivismo lógico (pp. 88-114). México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
SOAMES, Scott
2003 Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century (Vol. 1). New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
2005 Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century (Vol. 2). New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
WITTGENSTEIN, Ludwig
2001 [1921] Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
2014 [1933] Escrito a máquina [The Big Typescript]. Madrid: Trotta.