Techno-science and consilience as an agenda for the philosophy of technology
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article addresses a novel topic that has recently had very diverse treatments. Some of its objectives could be the following: it aims to point out some of the paths taken in the dialogue between science and technology over the last few decades and briefly describe the milestonesthat have led from classical (Newtonian) science to current techno-science. In the background, it also offers a few brushstrokes on the new philosophy of technology, which is built apart from old humanist prejudices, which has the theoretical development of consilience and does not want tobe directed primarily or exclusively towards engineering. In short, a philosophy of technique with a new ‘agenda’. The work has large blocks: the first describes the project of techno-science in its historical perspective. In a second moment, the aim is to situate technique in the history of sciences and techniques. The third part deals with the possibility (and also the need) for a new vision of these subjects, which has been called a sapiential and transdisciplinary vision. Finally, in the fourthpart, some steps are being taken in the field of technical philosophy under this new perspective, which could be considered as conclusions, the new ‘agenda’: the emergence of ethical approaches(among others, that of responsibility) and new visions of science-technology-society.
Article Details
Authorship: The list of authors signing must include only those people who have contributed intellectually to the development of the work. Collaboration in the collection of data is not, by itself, a sufficient criterion of authorship. "Sophia" declines any responsibility for possible conflicts arising from the authorship of the works that are published.
Copyright: The Salesian Polytechnic University preserves the copyrights of the published articles, and favors and allows their reuse under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Ecuador license. They may be copied, used, disseminated, transmitted and publicly displayed, provided that: i) the authorship and the original source of their publication (journal, editorial and work URL) are cited; (Ii) are not used for commercial purposes; Iii) mention the existence and specifications of this license.
References
ARISTÓTELES. 1987. Ética a Nicómaco. Madrid: Gredos.
ÅSBERG, Cecilia & LYKKE, Nina. 2010. Feminist technoscience studies. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 17(4), 299-305.
CHALMERS, Alan. 1988. ¿Qué es esa cosa llamada ciencia? Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.
ECHEVERRÍA, Javier. 2002. Ciencia y valores. Barcelona: Destino.
ECHEVERRÍA, Javier. 2003. La revolución tecnocientífica. México: FCE.
ECHEVERRÍA, Javier. 2005. La revolución tecnocientífica. Con-Fines ½, agosto-diciembre, 10.
ESTEBAN, Miguel. 1999. La ciencia como tecnología en John Dewey. Revista de Filosofía Diánoia, 45(45), 133-145.
FEENBERG, Andrew. 2003. Modernity and Technology. Cambridge (MA): MIT.
FEENBERG, Andrew. 2009. Rationalizing Play: A Critical Theory of Digital Gaming. Information Society Journal, 25(2), 105-118.
FEENBERG, Andrew. 2013. Del esencialismo al constructivismo. La filosofía de la tecnología en la encrucijada. Hipertextos, 1(1), julio-diciembre. Buenos Aires.
FRANSSEN, Maarten, VERMAAS, Pieter, KROES, Peter & MEIIERS, Athonie (eds.). 2016. Philosophy of Technology after the Empirical Turn. Springer International Publishing.
FRIEDMAN, Batya & KAHN, Peter. 2003. Human values, ethics, and design. En J. Jacko y A. Sears (eds.).The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
GROPPO, Giuseppe. 1991. Teologia dell’educazione: Origine, identità, compiti. Roma: LAS.
GUERRERO, Manuel & VEGA, Victoria. s/f. El proyecto Manhattan: tecnología nuclear. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/2SnSlOK/
HACKING, Ian. 1999. The Social Construction of What? Cambridge (MD): Harvard University Press.
HICKMAN, Larry. 1990. John Dewey’s Pragmatic Technology. Bloomington, Indianápolis: Indiana University Press.
HOTTOIS, Gilbert. 1999. Essais de philosophie bioéthique et biopolitique. París: Vrin.
IHDE, Don. 1991. Instrumental Realism: The Interface Between Philosophy of Science and Philosophy of Technology. Michigan: Indiana University Press.
IHDE, Don. 2004. A phenomenology of technics. En D. Kaplan (ed.). Readings in the philosophy of technology (pp. 137-159). Lanham (MD): Rowman & Littlefield.
JARAMILLO, Diego. 2015. ¿Existe una filosofía de la ingeniería? Universitas Philosophica, 32(64), 315-317.
JONAS, Hans. 1995. El principio de responsabilidad: ensayo de una ética para la civilización tecnológica. Barcelona: Herder.
JUAN PABLO II. 1998. Carta encíclica Fides et Ratio. Vaticano: LEV.
LATOUR, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action. How to follow Scientist and Engineers through Society. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
LATOUR, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford University Press.
LORENZEN, Paul. 1974. Konstruktive Wissenschaftstheorie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
MEDINA, Manuel. 1995. Tecnología y filosofía: más allá de los prejuicios epistemológicos y humanistas. Isegoría, 12, 180-197.
MEDINA, Manuel. 2005. Tecnociencia. Universidad de Barcelona. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/2Q0G413/
MITCHAM, Carl. 1985/2005. Encyclopedia of Science Technology and Ethics. Nueva York: MacMillan.
NISSENBAUM, Helen. 1998. Values in the Design of Computer Systems. Computers and Society, marzo, 38-39.
ORTEGA Y GASSET, José. 1939. Ensimismamiento y alteración: meditación de la técnica. Buenos Aires: Espasa-Calpe.
PIAGET, Jean. 1989. Clasificación de las ciencias y principales corrientes de la epistemología contemporánea. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
PICKERING, Andrew. 1995. The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
PRIGOGINE, Ilya & STENGERS, Isabelle. 1990ª. La nueva alianza: metamorfosis de la ciencia. Madrid: Alianza.
PRIGOGINE, Ilya & STENGERS, Isabelle. 1990b. Entre el tiempo y la eternidad. Madrid: Alianza.
RODRÍGUEZ, Eduardo. 2007. Ética de la investigación en modelos animales de enfermedades humanas originales. Acta Bioethica, 13(1), 25-40.
SILVA, Luis. 2012. La tecnociencia. Universidad Virtual del Estado de Guanajuato. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/2SsCGhj/
STIRLING, Andy. 2007. A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 4(15).
UDÍAS, Agustín. 2010. Ciencia y religión: dos visiones del mundo. Santander: Sal Terrae.
VERBEEK, Peter. 2005. What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design. Penn State University Press.
WILSON, Edward. 1998. Consilience. The Unity of Knowledge. Nueva York: Knopf.
WINNER, Langdon. 1983. Do Artifacts Have Politics? En D. Mackenzie et al. (eds.). The Social Shaping of Technology. Filadelfia: Open University Press.