Didactic strategies for the development of competences and complex thinking in university students
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The present investigation starts from the logical and theoretical framework of the development
of competences and complex thinking in the world university system. In this sense, the research
aimed to demonstrate the effects of the application of didactic strategies for the development of
competences and complex thinking in the Systems Engineering degree at a public university in
Lima provinces. The research was of an applied type, explanatory level, we worked with a preexperimental
design. The population was made up of 325 students from the professional career of
Systems Engineering, and the sample was taken non-probabilistically by 23 students of the X cycle.
The level of development of competencies was 74% in percentage terms and 64,25% in complex
thinking. It is concluded based on the three didactic strategies used (problem-based strategy,
collaborative learning strategies, and the incorporated strategy of information and communication
technologies) with a significance level of 5% and a (p-value: 0,006 < 0,050) that competencies
and complex thinking have been favorably developed in the students of the Professional Career in
Systems Engineering at the National University of Cañete, Lima, Peru.”
Article Details
Authorship: The list of authors signing must include only those people who have contributed intellectually to the development of the work. Collaboration in the collection of data is not, by itself, a sufficient criterion of authorship. "Sophia" declines any responsibility for possible conflicts arising from the authorship of the works that are published.
Copyright: The Salesian Polytechnic University preserves the copyrights of the published articles, and favors and allows their reuse under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Ecuador license. They may be copied, used, disseminated, transmitted and publicly displayed, provided that: i) the authorship and the original source of their publication (journal, editorial and work URL) are cited; (Ii) are not used for commercial purposes; Iii) mention the existence and specifications of this license.
References
ÁVILA, Roberto Benito 2001 Metodología de la Investigación. Lima: Estudio R.A.
BARBEROUSSE, Paulette 2007 Fundamentos teóricos del pensamiento complejo de Edgar Morin. Revista Electrónica Educare, 12(2), 95-113.
BROOKS, Router, WATERS, James, & PIMLOTT-WILSON, Hilton 2012 International education and the employability of UK students. British Educational Research Journal, 38(2), 281-298.
BRUNNER, Jerome 2003 Educación e Internet: ¿La próxima revolución? Santiago: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
FIGUEREIDO, Higs, BISCAIA, Romer, ROCHA, Veronika, & TEIXEIRA, Peter 2017 Should we start worrying? Mass higher education, skill demand and increasingly complex landscape of young graduates’ employment. Studies in Higher, 42(8), 1401-1420. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.201 5.1101754
GARCÍA, Joel 2007 Estructura Organizativa de la Educación en Venezuela. Tesis para optar al título de doctor. Maracaibo, Venezuela: Universidad Rafael Urdaneta.
GONZÁLES, Juan Miguel 2002 El bucle educativo: Aprendizaje, pensamiento complejo y transdisciplinariedad. Modelos de planificaciones de aula metacomplejas. Revista Integra Educativa, 2(2), 83-101.
GUZZOMI, Alen, MALE, Sartre, & MILLER, Karem 2015 Students’ responses to authentic assessment designed to develop commitment to performing at their best. European Journal of Engineering Education, 42(3), 1-22. https:// doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2015.1121465.
KALYUGA, Sendy, RENKL, Alberti, & PAAS, Ferdinand 2010 Facilitating flexible problem solving: A cognitive load perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 175- 186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9132-9.
KERLINGER, Fred, & LEE, Howard 2002 Investigación del comportamiento. México DF: McGraw Hill.
KNIGHT, Berenice 2011 Training in professional psychology in the US: An increased focus on competency attainment. Australian Psychologist, 46, 140-141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j1742-9544.2011.00026.x.
MANRÍQUEZ, Luis 2012 ¿Evaluación en Competencias? Estudios Pedagógicos XXXVIII, 1(1), 353-366, https://doi.org/10.4067/SO718-07072012000100022.
MANZANARES, Alberto, & SANTAMARÍA, José Sabina 2016 La dimensión pedagógica de la evaluación por competencias y la promoción del desarrollo profesional en el estudiante universitario. Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa, 5(1), 187-202.
MEDLAND, Emerine 2016 Assessment in higher education: Drivers, barriers and directions for change in the UK. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(1), 81-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.9 82072.
MILLER, Gentz 1990 The assessment of Clinical Skill. Compotence-Performance. Academic Medicine, 9(65), 63-67.
MÖLLER, Irene & GÓMEZ, Hasser 2014 Coherencia entre perfiles de egreso e instrumentos de evaluación en carreras de educación básica en Chile. Calidad en la Educación, 41, 17-49. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718- 45652014000200002.
MORALES, Santiago & ZAMBRANO, Hugo 2016 Coherencia evaluativa en formación universitaria por competencias: estudio en futuros educadores de Chile. Infancia Imágenes, 15(1), 9-26. https://doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.infimg.2016.1.a01.
MORÍN, Edgar 2003 Introducción al Pensamiento Complejo. Barcelona. Gedisa, S.A.
MURRAY, Gell-Mann (1995) El quark y el jaguar: aventuras en lo simple y lo complejo. Barcelona: Editorial Tusquets, Libros para pensar la Ciencia.
OLIVERI, Marie Estance & MARKLE, Robert 2017 Continuing a culture of evidence: Expanding skills in higher education. ETS Research Report, 1, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12137.
ORDÓÑEZ, German, VERDEJO, Peter, CORDERO, Carla María, GUERRA, Verónika, HERNÁNDEZ, Charles, MARTINS, Marco Jesús, MATA, José Lorenzo, MAZÓN, Idalberto, RAICHMAN de MIRASSO, Solier, ROCHA, Juan Alberto, RODRÍGUEZ, Nancy, TOTTER, Ernesto, & VELASCO, María Inés 2011 Estrategias para el desarrollo de competencias y pensamiento complejo en el aula en asignaturas del área de ingenierías. Universidad Industrial de Santander de Colombia: Innova Censal.
PABLO, Germán 2007 Noción y estructura del dato. Lima: Monografía.
PARDINAS, Joel 2004 Introducción a la Investigación Educacional. México: Panorama Editorial.
PAVIÉ, Almendra 2011 Enfoque basado en competencias: orientaciones sobre sus procedimientos de evaluación. Revista Electrónica de Desarrollo de Competencias (REDEC), 1(7), 114-147.
PEÑA, Johana Carolina 2018 Transformación del Docente desde el Pensamiento Complejo. Revista Scientific, 3(7), 211-230. https://doi.org/10.29394/Scientific.issn.2542-2987.2018.3.7.11.211-230.
TAPIA, Violeta & LUNA, Jorge 2010 Validación de una prueba de habilidades de pensamiento para estudiantes de cuarto y quinto de secundaria y primer año de universidad. REVISTA IIPSI, 3(2), 17-59.
TOBÓN, Sergio 2013 Formación integral y competencias. Pensamiento complejo, currículo, didáctica y evaluación. Bogotá: ECOE Ediciones.
TRIGOS, Lina 2001 Pensamiento complejo y competencias en la formación universitaria. Experiencias de innovación en docencia en la Universidad del Rosario. Bogotá: Editorial Universidad del Rosario.
UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CAÑETE 2016 Estatuto de la Universidad Nacional de Cañete. Cañete: UNDC.
VILLARROEL, Verónica & BRUNA, Daniela 2019 Do we assess what really matters? The challenge of autenthic assessment in higher education. Revista Calidad de la Educación, 50, 492-509.
YEOM, Moline 2016 Critical reflection on the massification of higher education in Korea: Consequences for graduate employment and policy issues. Journal of Education and Work, 29(1), 48-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2015.1049026.