Spanish youth facing disinformation and artificial intelligence: ideology, perception, and political participation
Main Article Content
Abstract
In a context of growing political disaffection and institutional distrust among Spanish youth, there is
an observable increase in sympathy toward authoritarian positions, ideological radicalization, and rejection of parties perceived as adversaries. This situation is escalating with the proliferation of the internet and social media, as well as with the rise of disinformation and the use of artificial intelligence within the online environment. This research analyzes Generation Z’s perception of their own ideology, electoral participation and use of the internet and social media to stay informed about politics, as well as their views on disinformation and trust in artificial intelligence. The analysis is based on bivariate tables drawn from a nationwide telephone survey conducted among Spanish residents aged 18 and older.
Results indicate that most young people place themselves ideologically on the right (36.5 %), left
(27.7 %), or center (21.2 %). However, voting preferences within the right-leaning group are split evenly between the Partido Popular and Vox (50 % each). Over 70 % of young respondents rely on the internet and social networks to stay informed about politics. Furthermore, perceptions of disinformation sources appear to be ideologically driven: over 70 % on the left blame the far right, while 75 % on the right reject that claim. Finally, around 60 % believe AI will worsen institutional and media communication—except far-right supporters.
Article Details
Universitas-XXI Journal aligns with the principles of open access and academic collaboration by adopting the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This license ensures that published content can be used and shared widely under the following conditions:
Attribution: Authors and the journal must be appropriately credited as the original creators of the content, with full reference and a link to the publication provided.
Non-commercial use: Content may not be used for commercial purposes, preserving its academic and educational intent.
ShareAlike: Derivative works must be distributed under the same terms as this license, promoting the creation of accessible and equitable knowledge.
By implementing this license, the Universitas-XXI Journal strengthens its commitment to disseminating high-quality research, providing free access to knowledge, and fostering a collaborative environment among researchers, educators, and students worldwide.
This decision reflects core values of responsibility, ethics, and transparency in academia, ensuring that intellectual contributions serve as a foundation for new research and projects while respecting the rights of authors and the scientific community.
For more information about this license, please visit the following link: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/"
References
Abu Zaid, A. A., & Ahmed Al-Shura. (2022). Artificial intelligence and the quality of judgment. Journal of the Faculty of Economics and Political Science, 23(4), 145-176.
Barredo-Ibáñez, D., De-la-Garza-Montemayor, D. J., Torres-Toukoumidis, Á., & López-López, P. C. (2021). Artificial intelligence, communication, and democracy in Latin America: a review of the cas¬es of Colombia, Ecuador, and Mexico. Profesional de la Información, 30(6).
Brennen, J. S., Howard, P. N., & Nielsen, R. K. (2022). What to expect when you’re expecting robots: Futures, expectations, and pseudo-artificial general intelligence in UK news. Journalism, 23(1), 22-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920947535
Calvo, D., Llorca-Abad, G. & Cano-Orón, L. (2025). Bulos y Barro. Cómo la DANA ejemplifica el problema de los desórdenes informativos. Madrid: Los libros de la Catarata.
Campos-Domínguez, E., & García-Orosa, B. (2018). Comunicación algorítmica en los partidos políticos: automatización de producción y circulación de mensajes. Profesional de la Información, 27(4), 769-777. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.jul.06
Castilla-Guerra, J. (2025). “Marco normativo de la Inteligencia Artificial a nivel comunitario”. En L. Teruel-Rodríguez & L. García-Faroldi (Eds.). Los medios de comunicación ante la desinformación: inteligencia artificial, discursos de odio, teorías de la conspiración y verificación. Valencia: Tirant Humanidades.
Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas (CIS). Barómetro de julio 2025. Estudio nº3517.
Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas (CIS). Barómetro de julio 2023. Estudio nº3413.
Chagas, V., Carreiro, R., Santos, N., & Popolin, G. (2022). Far-Right Digital Activism in Polarized Contexts: A Comparative Analysis of Engagement in Hashtag Wars. Media and Communication, 10(4), 42-55. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i4.5622
Coeckelbergh, M. (2021). Ética de la inteligencia artificial. Madrid: Cátedra.
Conway, M. (2020). Routing the Extreme Right: Challenges for Social Media Plattforms. The RUSI Journal, 165(1), 108-113.
De-Lima-Santos, M. F., & Ceron, W. (2021). Artificial intelligence in news media: current perceptions and future outlook. Journalism and media, 3(1), 13-26. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia3010002
España, O. (2024, 11 junio). El uso de la Inteligencia Artificial en procesos electorales. Naciones Unidas para Europa Occidental - España. https://bit.ly/4fbaMPa
Gartner (2023, 23 de agosto). What's New in the 2023 Gartner Hype Cycle for Emerging Technologies. https://bit.ly/3TX8OrS
Garriga, M., Ruiz-Incertis, R., & Magallón-Rosa, R. (2024). Artificial Intelligence, disinformation and media literacy proposals around deepfakes. Observatorio (OBS), 18(5)
González-Baquero, W. Amores, J.J., & Arcila-Calderón, C. (2023). From Belief to Hate. An Analysis of the Beliefs That Support the Hate Speech Towards Migrants and Refugees Spread on Twitter from the Theory of Reasoned Action. Trípodos, 53 (1), 32-53
Grace, K., Stewart, H., Sandkühler, J. F., Thomas, S., Weinstein-Raun, B., & Brauner, J.(2024). Thousands of AI authors on the future of AI. arXiv. https://bit.ly/4kXIOI4
Hernández Carballido, M. (2023). ¿Qué es la antipolítica? Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política, 32(1), 9-29. https://doi.org/10.26851/RUCP.32.1.1
Hiscox (2022). El coste de los ciberataques se duplica en el último año para las empresas españolas. https://bit.ly/4o4Eb1l
López-López, P.C., Lagares-Díez, N., & Puentes-Rivera, I. (2022). “La inteligencia artificial contra la desinformación: una visión desde la comunicación política”. Razón y Palabra, 24(111), 5-11.
Mantelero, A. (2022). Beyond Data: Human Rights, Ethical and Social Impact Assessment in AI. Berlin: Springer, Information Technology and Law Series.
Ministerio de Asuntos Económicos y Transformación Digital (2020). Plan España Digital 2025. https://bit.ly/44LPrIA
Rachmad, Y. E. (2025). Managing Gen Z: Competencies and Certification as the Key to Success. United Nations Development Programme.
Rebollo Delgado, L. (2023). Inteligencia Artificial y derechos fundamentales. Madrid: Dykinson.
Rojo Puertas, J. (2024). La política de los jóvenes en España. Cómo participan, actitudes políticas y representatividad en el primer cuarto del siglo XXI. Fundación Alternativas, 235. https://bit.ly/3H7TZjg
Rouyet, J.I. (2023). Estupidez Artificial. Cómo usar la inteligencia artificial sin que ella te utilice a tí. Madrid: Libros.com.
Schmitt, C. (2009). El concepto de lo político. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Sedano, J., Blanco, S., & Palomo, B. (2025). “Imagen y desinformación en la era de la inteligencia artificial”. En L. Teruel-Rodríguez & L. García-Faroldi (Eds.). Los medios de comunicación ante la desinformación: inteligencia artificial, discursos de odio, teorías de la conspiración y verificación. Valencia: Tirant Humanidades.
Thomas, M. (2024, 25 julio). 14 Risks and Dangers of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Built In. https://bit.ly/46WRKde
Toledo, R. (2022). Ciberataques a empresas en 2022. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/3U1iOjU
Torcal, M. (2023). De votantes a hooligans. Madrid: Los Libros de la Catarata.
Yu, X., Wojcieszak, M. & Casas, A. (2024). Partisanship on Social Media: In-Party Love Among American Politicians, Greater Engagement with Out-Party Hate Among Ordinary Users. Polit Behav 46, 799–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-022-09850-x